A big development in the Sam Ke Ting accident case was the one in which eight people lost their lives. According to reports, Sam Ke Ting was previously convicted of killing eight cyclists, but now he has been found not guilty, the charges were flawed and the conviction will not stand. Yes, you heard right, Sam Ke Ting has been cleared of charges of killing eight people while he was driving recklessly. The court declared that the charges against him were faulty and that the conviction should not stand. People are asking numerous questions about the Sam Ke Ting accident. We dig deep and follow each report to gather information about this accident. This article will let you know all the imperative details of the accident in one place. So stay true to this page and keep reading this article. Drag down the page.
Details of the accident of Sam Ke Ting
Previously, Sam Ke Ting was found guilty of reckless driving that killed eight modified bike riders. This incident happened 6 years ago. Datuk Hisyam Teh Pok Teik, who is lead counsel and acted on behalf of Sam Ke Ting in his appeal, said the charges did not clearly distinguish whether Sam Ke Ting was charged with reckless or dangerous driving. Datuk Hisyam Teh Pok Teik stated this in the Court of Appeal in a charge sheet. Scroll down the page and read more details.
Furthermore, lead lawyer Datuk Hisyam Teh Pk Teik said that instead, Sam Ke Ting was charged and convicted of both offences. He stated in the charge sheet: “There are three separate offenses under Section 41(a) of the Road Transport Act 1987, namely driving a motor vehicle recklessly, driving a motor vehicle at a speed or driving a motor vehicle in a manner that is, under all circumstances, dangerous. But what the prosecutors did, in this case, was join member one, which is reckless driving, with member three, which is dangerous driving. This is wrong, since the law only allows one member to be framed”
Lead counsel Hisyam filed an appeal before a three-judge panel headed by Judges Datuk Hadhariah Syed Ismail, Datuk Azman Abdullah and Datuk Hashim Hamzah in Sam’s appeal against the six-year jail order and RM6,000 fine. Sam’s legal representative asked the court: “When the charge is bad for duplicity, the conviction should be set aside.” Stay tuned to this website for more details.
Categories: Trending
Source: vtt.edu.vn