Here we are going to talk about the recent news of the Supreme Court verdict on same-sex marriage. The public is searching the internet for more information about the recent news on same-sex marriage and they not only like to know what the Supreme Court verdict is on the same as the news regarding it is going viral on the internet. So, for our readers, in this article we have provided information about the ongoing viral news regarding same-sex marriage. Not only that, we are also going to tell what is the verdict of the Supreme Court in this regard, as the public is also searching about it on the Internet. So, keep reading the article to know more.
The Supreme Court denied same-sex marriage
Millions of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ+) people in India were shocked by the Supreme Court’s Tuesday decision to deny legal recognition to same-sex couples and rule that only the federal government and legislatures States can approve marriages. By a 3-2 margin, the court also declined to uphold the rights of civil unions and queer couples to adopt children, noting that requiring the state to recognize or grant legal status to some unions would run counter to the doctrine. of the separation of powers and could have undesirable effects. consequences.
This court can only interpret and apply the law; you can’t create it. The ruling said the court should refrain from addressing issues while using its judicial review authority, especially when they impact policies that fall within the legislative realm. The right to marry is not a fundamental right, according to the constitutional bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, S. Ravindra Bhat, Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha . The court also ruled that it is outside the courts’ purview to order the legislature to define same-sex marriages and queer relationships through new legislation.
The unanimous view of the court was that “the directions or orders of this court cannot encroach upon the domain of the legislature,” noting that Parliament and state assemblies had passed laws establishing and governing the socio-legal institution of marriage under the Constitution. However, there were two major areas where both sides disagreed: adoption rights and the acceptance of civil unions, which is often considered the first step toward achieving full marriage equality. The decision ruined the dreams of about 20 petitioners who had petitioned the Supreme Court, alleging that their constitutional rights had been infringed because their relationships had prevented them from receiving the financial benefits that their heterosexual contemporaries had received.
Categories: Biography
Source: vtt.edu.vn