Here we are going to give the details about the Babita Deokaran case as the public is searching about it over the internet. The public is going through the internet to know more about her. And not only that they also like to know information regarding her case. So, we have brought information about her in this article for our readers. Not only that we are also going to give the details about her case as the public is searching about it over the internet. So, keep reading through the article to know more.
Who Is Babita Deokaran?
On Tuesday, the six individuals were given penalties ranging from six to 22 years, yet the court and the general public are left wondering under whose orders the six men acted. The National Prosecuting Authority has vowed to pursue “persons of interest” whose information has been provided by the convicted in its pursuit of justice. The six men who were accused of killing Gauteng Department of Health official and whistleblower Babita Deokaran spent nearly 24 months in custody before they pleaded guilty to all charges and were given distinct sentences to effective incarceration based on the roles they each played, ranging from six to 22 years.
The Johannesburg High Court was informed that neither the shooter of Deakoran nor the assassination’s mastermind had been apprehended. This occurred the day before the Deokaran murder’s second anniversary, which was on August 23, 2021. The rulings also came two weeks after President Cyril Ramaphosa gave the Special Investigating Unit permission to continue looking into the R1 billion in erroneous Tembisa Hospital bids that Babita Deokaran assisted in exposing before her murder. Charges of murder attempted murder, and illegal possession of weapons and ammunition were brought against the six individuals.
One of the individuals charged with attempted murder was in Deokoran’s car when the gunshot occurred. All of the guys appeared before the Johannesburg High Court on Tuesday and entered guilty pleas. This came after the state and the defense team reached a plea and sentence arrangement before trial in accordance with section 105A(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977. State prosecutor Steven Reuben read the agreement before the court and made references to the assassination being thoroughly planned early in the month prior to the crucial day, with guidance coming from alleged intermediaries who were only described as “Khanyisani Mpungose” and “Sithole.” Stay tuned with us to know more about this case and for the latest updates on the news.
Categories: Trending
Source: vtt.edu.vn