She’s ready to cut the cord.
An Italian mother, fed up with the way her older children are taken advantage of, has won an unusual court case to evict the “parasitic” couple from her home.
The plaintiff, identified only as a 75-year-old retiree living in the northern city of Pavia, had filed a lawsuit in the Pavia Court, accusing her children, ages 40 and 42, of overstaying their welcome. CNN reported, citing information. from a local court clerk.
According to the complaint, both adult men, whom the disgruntled father labeled “hangers-on” in the court filing, are employed but have continued to live in their apartment rent-free.
The mother is separated from her husband and lives on her pension, which is entirely used to maintain the home and food.
The rogue duo has not contributed financially, nor even helped with household chores, the lawsuit claims.
Judge Simona Caterbi sided with the mother and ruled this week that the children, whom she mocked as “bamboccioni” or “big babies,” have until December 18 to move out of their mother’s apartment.
“There is no provision in the legislation that grants the adult child the unconditional right to remain in the house exclusively owned by the parents, against their will and solely by virtue of family ties,” he wrote in his decision obtained by the local court. Prima Pavia news site.
In Italy, it is common and culturally acceptable for children over 30 to continue living with their parents.
The practice of remaining in the family home well into adulthood is especially common among men, who are called “mammoni” or “mama’s sons.”
Armed with this knowledge, the woman’s children turned to a lawyer and countersued their mother to prevent her from evicting them, arguing that Italian parents are required by law to “maintain” – or support – their children for as long as possible. necessary.
The plaintiff, identified only as a 75-year-old retiree who lives in the northern city of Pavia, had filed a lawsuit in the Pavia Court, accusing her children, ages 40 and 42, of overstaying their welcome, it reported. CNN.ÐÑÑÐμÑлР°Ð² ÐÑмÑев – stock.adobe.com
In her decision issued Tuesday, Judge Caterbi recognized the existing law, but argued that “it no longer seems justifiable considering that the two defendants are subjects over 40 years of age, and once a certain age is exceeded, the child can no longer wait that parents continue the maintenance obligation beyond limits that are no longer reasonable.”
The lawyer representing the children told local media that the two had not yet decided whether they would appeal the eviction order.
Categories: Trending
Source: vtt.edu.vn