A Georgetown University professor who spent 12 years as a CIA intelligence analyst warns that diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) efforts and the overall politicization of the intelligence community have become a “significant” problem and that he trusts that those agencies will try to solve it. interfere with the 2024 elections in a manner similar to his efforts in 2020.
“My guess is that the proverbial deep state within the intelligence community will re-emerge because presumably a Republican candidate will once again be seen as a threat to the domestic policies that many intelligence people like,” said Dr. John Gentry, author of the new book. “Neutering the CIA: Why US Intelligence vs. Trump Has Long-Term Consequences,” he told Fox News Digital.
Within days of the explosive New York Post story detailing the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop in the run-up to the 2020 election, 51 former intelligence officials signed a letter in an attempt to discredit the laptop, saying which “has all the classic features.” characteristics of a Russian information operation.
The CIA approved the release of Hunter Biden’s infamous laptop letter, according to documents obtained by Fox News Digital in 2023.
Gentry told Fox News Digital that downplaying the Hunter Biden laptop was “clearly political” and that a high-ranking source told him “in very clear terms” that it was done “explicitly” with the “intent of helping the campaign.” of Biden.”
Dr. John Gentry, who spent 12 years as a CIA intelligence analyst, warns Americans about diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) efforts and the overall politicization of the intelligence community. Fox News
He said there have already been signs in recent weeks that current or former members of the intelligence agency will be active in 2024.
“I have long thought that we are likely to see former intelligence officers politically active against Trump or whoever the Republican presidential nominee is next year, and I hope that the leaks resume,” Gentry said. “The ‘exes’ activities have already resumed, a little sooner than I expected.”
Gentry pointed to a recent article by Marc Polymeropoulos, a CIA official who retired in 2019 and co-edited the Hunter Biden laptop “open letter,” and former FBI employee Asha Rangappa that warned of the dangers of Trump’s campaign rhetoric. path.
“Asha Rangappa once worked in the FBI and was also openly anti-Trump, although as a relatively young former, she attracted less attention than many,” Gentry said. “I think it’s worth keeping an eye on these people. “Many have compromised her credibility with actions like the ‘Laptop 51’ letter.”
The CIA approved the release of Hunter Biden’s infamous laptop letter. ABC
A major problem in recent decades, Gentry said, was the introduction of DEI policies at major intelligence agencies, including the CIA, that diverted attention from daily operations to a more “woke” political agenda.
“Half a century ago it was an effort to get more women and minorities into the intelligence community,” Gentry said. “This was done under the rubric of affirmative action. It gradually became a policy during the Clinton administration. But an important step forward was taken—or not, depending on how you look at it—when President Obama signed an executive order designed to improve diversity and inclusion in the federal workforce.“
Gentry revealed that discussions about personal politics did not occur during his time at the CIA. AFP/Getty Images
Gentry told Fox News Digital that discussions about personal politics did not occur during his time at the CIA, but that sources in the intelligence community during the Obama years told him that the standard had largely “gone away” and that the Political activism was “common.”
Two of the main drivers of the most politically active intelligence agencies, Gentry explained, were former CIA Director John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper.
Gentry said Brennan and Clapper were strong supporters of Obama’s desire to transform the federal workforce, so they began to accelerate this process and did a number of things from a policy standpoint, in terms of targeted recruiting efforts, For example, and they pressured their employees to care more about diversity and inclusion issues and, even in Brennan’s case, to be politically active.
Gentry told Fox News Digital that there is no doubt that DEI and politicization within intelligence agencies have had a negative effect on the morale of rank-and-file workers.
“There are a lot of people who are not happy about this because it is politicizing the workforce and it is dividing the workforce between people who believe in DEI policies and those who don’t,” Gentry said.
“And even in the Obama period, the director of analysis had people who started talking about, quote, ‘soft totalitarianism.’ This was a direct result of Brennan’s politically driven top-down policies; totalitarianism is a reminder of the Soviet Union and China, etc. Well, this has several effects in terms of performance and credibility.”
Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper was one of the main drivers of the most politically active intelligence agencies, Gentry explained. fake images
Gentry said his book will hopefully help readers “appreciate that there is a major political problem within the agencies” and that former members of the intelligence community saw how effective they were in damaging Trump in 2020 and “no one was criticized.”
“If we put all these things together, I’m pretty sure we’ll see a resurgence of activism,” Gentry said.
In a speech at the Aspen Security Forum in July, CIA Director William Burns addressed the issue of politicization within the intelligence community.
“My obligation, and President Biden frequently reminds me, is to provide the best intelligence we can directly collect and analyze, even when that is inconvenient for policymakers. “I’ve spent enough time on the other side of the table to know when it’s inconvenient, when someone tells you that the big new idea is actually not that big, not that new, and not that effective,” Burns said.
“Our job is to be clear about it, whether it is welcome at the center, in the White House or in other parts of the executive branch or not. It’s not an easy role to play, but it’s incredibly important. It’s something I take seriously. I know Director Haines and other members of the American intelligence community. “That’s what our officers go out of their way to provide.”
Categories: Trending
Source: vtt.edu.vn