On Tuesday, the Supreme Court refused to hear an Indiana public school district defend its sex-segregated bathrooms.
The highest court offered no comment when it rejected the Martinsville Metropolitan School District’s appeal of a lower court’s decision that prohibiting transgender students from using the bathrooms of the gender with which they identify violates the students’ constitutional rights and the federal anti-discrimination law.
Lawyers for the school district had asked the court to “preserve the autonomy of school boards to make decisions.”
A spokesperson for Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita sharply criticized the Supreme Court for its inaction, saying it “failed to take the opportunity necessary to provide clarity.”
“It makes little sense for SCOTUS not to resolve the dispute in federal cases, but because of this division, children in other parts of this country will be adequately protected,” the spokesperson told The Post in an email.
“Unfortunately, for now, our schools will be forced to allow transgender students to use the bathroom that they deem corresponds to the gender identity they have chosen to use that day. “We will continue our fight so that regular, common-sense Hoosier parents can raise their children free of this toxic transanity.”
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected an Indiana public school district’s request to uphold a policy that restricted bathroom access based on sex. AP
The case originated in 2022 when the mother of a transgender seventh-grade boy, identified in court documents as “AC,” won her lawsuit challenging the Martinsville Metropolitan School District’s policy that prevented her son from using the men’s bathroom.
AC was diagnosed with gender dysphoria and was in the process of legally changing her name and gender on her birth certificate, according to the lawsuit.
The Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an order that the school allow access to the bathroom corresponding to the student’s gender identity the following year.
The Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal filed by the Metropolitan School District of Martinsville, Indiana. fake images
The school district had argued that Title IX allows schools to provide separate bathrooms based on sex and that equal protection concerns do not prevent schools from protecting the interests of other students “by protecting their bodies from exposure to the opposite sex.” “.
The transgender rights case is not the first that the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has sidestepped.
Last year, however, he refused to allow West Virginia to enforce a state law banning transgender athletes from participating on women’s sports teams in public schools, one of many Republican-backed measures across the country aimed at LGBT rights.
Other federal courts across the country have been divided on school policies requiring transgender students to use the bathroom corresponding to their birth sex.
The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Richmond, Virginia, found that a Virginia school’s policy was illegal, while the 11th Circuit, based in Atlanta, upheld one at a Florida school.
At least nine states restrict transgender students from using bathrooms that match the sex they were assigned at birth.
With pole cables
Categories: Trending
Source: vtt.edu.vn