The hosts of ABC’s “The View” debated whether Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) could potentially run as a third-party candidate in the 2024 presidential election and help President Trump get re-elected.
Manchin announced Thursday that he would not seek re-election to the Senate. “I made one of the most difficult decisions of my life and decided that I will not run for reelection to the United States Senate. But what I will do is travel the country and speak to see if there is interest in creating a movement to mobilize the middle classes and unite Americans. “We need to take America back and not let this divisive hatred tear us further apart.”
Several “The View” co-hosts worried that he would do so, with some speculating that he would join the No Labels movement.
Co-host Joy Behar noted that Manchin “has a lot of people wondering if power in DC will shift to the right, because yesterday he announced that he will end his career as the worst Democrat in the Senate,” adding that he was “right up there with Kyrsten Sinema.”
“So we’re going to lose the Senate over this?” Behar asked.
All the hosts of “The View” were concerned that Joe Manchin could disrupt President Biden’s bid for re-election. ABC
“Very likely,” co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin responded, before later noting that “it seemed like Joe Manchin was hinting at a possible third-party offer. People have wondered if he would enter the No Labels discussion. I’ve been very critical of No Labels because my fear is that, one, it would end up boosting Trump, getting more followers for him, but I also think that for a third party, which we need in this country, it’s “It’s going to take years, not a cycle”.
However, she did argue that she is becoming “excited” about certain aspects of the idea in theory and that she likes many of the candidates associated with the movement to the point that she is “willing to listen to what they have to say, but I am concerned.” “Let that happen.” “It could end up boosting the most dangerous candidate.”
Co-host Sunny Hostin said she wasn’t sure if a third-party candidate had “ever had success outside of taking away votes” from either of the larger parties, as others recalled names like Ralph Nader and Jill Stein. She then argued: “I think it’s a bad idea, I think it’s a much better idea to have a healthier Republican Party that’s not led by Donald Trump. “I think it’s time for moderate, sophisticated Republicans to step up and denounce Trump and I think that would solve the problem much more than this Unlabeled Party.”
Co-host Ana Navarro argued that Joe Manchin has “been a problem child for the Democrats for the last few years, him and Kyrsten Sinema, but he has been part of the family and has kept them in the majority, so he has played a very important role.” ”. .”
Manchin was labeled a “problem child” on the show. Michael Brochstein/SOPA Images/Shutterstock
However, she denied that her possible candidacy would be a disaster for Democrats.
He added that while he initially liked the No Labels movement, “to me this is a desperate cry for relevance and attention from a group of former ‘somewhat’ elitist people who are thirsty to be part of the conversation.” He then proposed asking Manchin: “Are you willing to be responsible for returning Donald Trump to the White House? The man who has been a threat to democracy, a threat to American values, who led an insurrection? Is he willing to be a part of something that could end up putting that man who shouldn’t be anywhere near the Oval Office? He should be in a jail cell.”
Ana Navarro described Manchin’s possible offer as a “desperate cry for relevance.” ABC
Sara Haines argued that even if she likes the Unlabeled Party in theory and as a future prospect with potential, “I don’t think it’s right for this election because of the risk of running against Donald Trump.”
Griffin stated that he had spoken to “people involved with No Labels who have said that if they see that the polls show that it will be a boon for Trump, they will end up removing their names from the ballot.”
Behar rejected the idea that this would be the “death knell for Democrats,” citing election results from earlier in the week that “show that voters are much more motivated by issues like keeping abortion rights safe,” warning them against forget the possible electoral consequences of Trump’s decision. participation in the end of Roe v. Wade.
Categories: Trending
Source: vtt.edu.vn